Morrison and Reese (1986)

Test Information
Year 1986
Test Location University of Houston Foundation Test Facility, TEXAS, USA
Test Type Large Scale
Reference Morrison, C., and Reese, L. C. (1986). “A lateral-load test of full-scale pile group in sand.” GR86-1, FHWA, Washington D.C.
Purpose Analysis and Comprehension of Pile Groups
Keywords p-y curves;pile groups; p-multipliers; group efficiency; lateral loads; scour
Soil Information
Soil Type Sand
Soil Description The native-clay soil (stiff-OC Beaumont clay) was removed from the upper portion of the piles and replaced with clean medium dense sand.
Pile Information
Pile Material Steel with Grout Fill
Pile Placement Method Driven closed-ended
Pile Cross Section Circular
Outside Section 10.75 in (27.3 cm)
Wall Thickness 0.365 in
Test Configuration
Test Configuration Pile Group
Pile Spacing 3D
Group Arrangement Box Arrangement
Test Columns 3
Test Rows 3
Head Boundary Condition Free
Loading
Type of Loading Static Two-Way Cyclic
Axial Load N/A
Load Application A drilled shaft 6ft in diameter and 36 ft deep had been installed at the site and was used in this project.
Test Results
Max Top Displacement 4.2 cm
Deflection 0.10 diam
Analysis Method
Comparison with P-Y Curves Reese, Cox, Koop (19875) and Modified RCK (MRCK=RCK*1.55)
Soil Model DEFPIG, Focht-Koch, Single-Pile, Bogart-Matlock
Software Used COM624, DEFPIG
Group Efficiency Factor 0.58-0.9
P-Multipliers (lead, 2nd, 3rd, n-th rows) 0.8, 0.4, 0.36
Conclusions
Comparisons •It is believed that the p-y curves generated by MRCK model the single pile response in an adeguate way; •Even if methods used were generally succesfull in predicting deflections and maximum moments, no method was able to make correct predictions of deflections, maximum moment and the distribution of load to the piles. (see Table)


Outcomes • The response of the single pile to lateral load is stiffer than the response of the average pile in the pile group.
• For both the single pile and the pile group, the response of the piles to static loading is stiffer than the response to cyclic loading.
• The distribution of load to the piles in the group is not uniform. The leading row takes a larger portion of the load than the middle row, which in turn takes a larger portion than the trailing row.
• The ultimate soil resistance for the leading row of piles is larger than the ultimate soil resistance for the middle row which is in turn larger than that for the trailing row.